Response to Maxime Rodinson on Orientalism

 Hasan A. Yahya, Professor of Philosophyeasily seen by beginners in the study of social
Working on Crescentologism as a philosophicalsciences.  I would respect his analysis more if.
research approach,  Maxim Rodinson critics of applied the rules of Crescentologism which I
Said Orientalism, makes me respond in this article.termed to include both the East and West in his
It is too late now,  but necessary, after both hadattacks. There was the point He as well as Said
died in sequent years 2003 and 2004.  Maximefell into. (3)
Rodinson, in his thoughts on the future ofIn Three Arab Criques of Orientalism, Donald P.
researches in Islam, advises students not to beLittle examines the works of Tibawi, A.
too dogmatic about the phenomenon calledAbdul-Malik and Edward Said. For example he did
Orientalism. He goes as far as to point out that,criticizes Tibawi’s view that Orientalism close
“There is,… no such thing as Orientalism,the door to study Islam by non-Muslims,
Sinology, Iranology, and so forth. Rather there areAbdul-Malik too, was having the same critique, but
scientific disciplines defined both by the object ofaccepted his Marxist inclination, where colonization
their study and by the direction the study takes,goes hand in hand with Orientalism. (4) After all,
such as sociology, demography, political economy,Said was right, in describing Post Colonialism
linguistic, anthropology, ethnology or the various domination.  After leaving the Arab and Muslim
branches of general history. (1)world Colonialism continues to work through other
Rodinson did not deny the existence of ameans, for example through Christian missionaries
particular field of study labeledwhich was not only supported but initially
“Orientalism” as such but is merely statingaccompanied colonial powers for the OBJECT
that this method of study is supposed to be and DIRECTION of studies of the Orient
scientific. What makes his statement nullified his(according to Rodinson use of the terms) to
recognition that the studies “defined both bychange the language and religion of the colonized
the object of their study and by the direction thepeople as it was the case in Algeria, Libya,
study takes.” Which opens the door wide forLebanon, Syria, Morocco and Egypt.
errors in the object of these studies concerningBefore I conclude this part, there was an
Orientalism and the errors direction which theseanecdote, I like readers to know. It is  about one
studies make.missionary priest in Nigeria, he called  the people
The object and directions of Orientalism werein a small village to follow Jesus in his first visit. 
guided reinforced by European dominance overThe next visit he brought food and western
other societies especially the Middle Eastern andclothes telling the people that Jesus sent for them
African societies. He himself agrees that “theas his people. The third visit he asked their
result was a greatly distorted vision of things.”permission to let Jesus visit their village,  so he
In spite of these errors of object and direction ofbuilt a small church suit Jesus presence. Few days
Orientalism, he criticized Edward Said’spast, a helicopter began to bring wood and irons,
severely. Western scholars self satisfaction doesand crosses. The church was built. The villagers
not mean that their studies are completely valid.were invited to celebrate Jesus in his Church on
But he carries his views to attack Said’stime of Sunset. In the inauguration day, he called
militant philosophy and his nationalistic views. for the Chief of the village to open the ceremony.
These views in fact, were behind the object andThe Chief stood and shouted: Hay Sa’eed:
directions of their studies of Arab, Islam and Go up over the tower and  call Sunset Athan,
Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam. Others,for prayer.  (5) (861 words)
however, consider Said’s Orientalism  as aApprviations of Journals consulted in this article:
“counter-attack” against WesternMW The Muslim World.,  IJMES  International
Orientalists. (2)Journal of Middle East Studies., IQ  Islamic
In my opinion, supporting other scholars in theQuarterly
field of sociology and cultureolgy, Said’s workNotes:
as a serious study has achieved tremendous1.M. Rodinson, Europe and the Mystique of Islam.
success among scholars in both East and West,Trans. From the French by R. Veinus (1988), p.117.
and instigated  enormous debate. The terms2. Hassan . Gai Review of  Said’s Other
used by Said in Orientalism open the eyes towardWork Covering Islam,IQ, Vol.29, No.I (First
them such as “ Ethnocentrism, ImperialismQuarter, 1985)pp.52-55.
and racism and essentialism, etc., Said’s3. Orientalism and its Critics, IJMES, Vol. 20, No. 2
attack on “Foucaultian perspectives” was(1993), pp.158.
because these perspectives reflect the desire for4. MW, Vol.69, No.2 (April 1979)pp.110-31.
power over others. While I accept his ciritics to5. Jabal Muhammad Buaben has an excellent book
Said for being one-sided, I deplore his statementon the subject titled: Image of the Prophet
that Orientalism studies were pure of errors ofMuhammad in the West: A Study of Muir,
object and direction of Orieantalist studies. EvenMargoliouth, and Watt,  The Islamic Foundation,
historical analysis of Orientalist studies can beLondon 1996.